Post-Election Governance: A Call for Accountability

While elections come and go, the aftermath reveals a deeper and more disturbing truth: our so-called democracy often results in the erosion of our individual freedoms. Despite the public’s expressed will through the ballot box, we continue to find ourselves entangled in a web of laws that not only restrict our rights but actively infringe upon them. This stark reality raises a crucial question: are we truly free under a government that regularly defies the very principles of liberty and justice enshrined in the Constitution?

Miraculously, Donald Trump and intelligent voters saved America from the Obama-Biden-Harris gang. Bonnie and Clyde were saints compared to those traitors.

Whether Trump can reverse the slide into tyranny remains to be seen, because the deep state is firmly entrenched in the legislature, the courts, and the bureaucracy. As we speak, the government continues to pass unconstitutional laws that violate citizens’ rights. These laws, upheld by Congress and the Supreme Court, not only betray the Constitution they constitute crimes.

Agents of Tyranny

There are tens of thousands government agents—federal, state, and local—who likewise commit a crime by enforcing these laws. They commit criminal acts under Title 18, U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, which punish those who deprive individuals of their constitutional rights.

I have written extensively about the clear and blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment which the Federal government is not allowed to infringe in the slightest. Every person has a right to personal defense and collective defense against a tyrannical government.

Beyond that, the right to bail is oftentimes denied completely by claiming a person is a threat to society or a flee risk. The right to a habeas corpus has been limited to one filing. The "protections" of a rubber-stamp Grand Jury from unjustified prosecution are non-existent. The right to effective assistance of counsel for indigent defendants is meaningless when overworked and incompetent public defenders are assigned to defend you.

But what about the right to a fair trial?

It doesn't exist because you will be punished with a longer sentence for exercising that right. You will spend decades in prison, or even life, if you don't plead guilty.

The black-robed judges (criminals) have ruled that a reduced sentence for a guilty plea is "justified" by saving court costs. But if you offer to pay those court costs, the judges won't let you. Even if they did, you won't get a lower sentence.

In other words, defendants are coerced into waiving their right to a jury trial. I exposed this fraud in my own unconstitutional firearms trial and subsequent sentencing.

My pretended attorney (who I fired for incompetence but was sitting beside me) demanded a definite answer on my pretended intent to plea guilty. I told him “I have no choice.” My sole intent was to expose the extortionate plea they call “uncoerced and voluntary”. Judge Hugh Lawson strutted to his throne, grinning. The stage was set.

THE COURT: Mr. Pealock, the United States Attorney indicates to me that you decided you want to change your plea, is that right?

PEALOCK: Well, Your Honor, it looks like I have no choice under the conditions. You know, I have no assistance.

THE COURT: Well, you know, one of the basic things about a plea of guilty by a defendant and an acceptance of a guilty plea by the Court is that the plea be freely and voluntarily entered. Now, you just used the phrase you “don’t have any choice.”

PEALOCK: Yes, Sir. I have no assistance of counsel and it’s impossible for me to win the case so I have no choice but to plea.

THE COURT: Well, is there—I mean, is this—I’m not trying—I’m not saying to you that you’ve got to change your assessment of your case, but another interpretation of your words could be that you are being coerced or forced to enter this plea of guilty, and if that’s the case, if that’s the way you feel, then I will not accept a plea of guilty. We’ll just get on with the trial.

PEALOCK: Well, I have to be honest, Your Honor. I know that I’m punished if I don’t so...

THE COURT: You know what?

PEALOCK: I’m punished. I will be punished (with more time) if I don’t plead guilty.

THE COURT: Well, is that—if you enter your plea of guilty, will you do it freely and voluntarily even though it’s based on your personal assessment of your situation and the case?

PEALOCK: Your Honor, I will be doing it because I have to. I’m forced into it.

THE COURT: Well, I won’t accept that plea. Let’s just go on with the trial.

My pretended lawyer and the criminal U.S. Attorney dropped their heads and flushed crimson with embarrassment. I felt pretty good.

“What did you do that for?” My lawyer whispered through clenched teeth.

“Because I felt like it. Speaking the truth feels darn good; maybe you should try it sometime.”

This exchange and a lot more courtroom excitement and prison drama (far beyond anything you will ever see in the movies) is in my extraordinary book, They Left No Crime Uncommitted. It is not my best writing because I had to stand up and write on top of a half-locker. I had to live in a three-man 70 sq. ft. sardine cell with no room for a table or chair.

I wrote another book about unconstitutional gun laws titled Ban Assault Bananas. I plan to retitle it to the more appropriate Gun Control is a Crime, and Those Who Enforce it Are Criminals. My arguments are indisputable.

Let me close this post by stating my concern about some of Trump's appointees. Tulsa Gabbard, for instance, was/is a democrat who has called for more unconstitutional gun laws. Some have connections to George Soros and other miscreants. A meticulous researcher named Kelleigh Nelson has written several warning articles on Trump's new appointees. Read part One here, part Two here, and part Three here.

I also want to give a shout out to Andrew Wallace, a former Kentucky State Trooper, who calls it like it is. Here is an excerpt from his article, Congressmen Who Vote For Unconstitutional Laws Are Traitors!

"Those members of Congress (the majority) who vote for Unconstitutional laws should be indicted tried and put in prison. Guilty members of Congress should also be removed from office for violation of their oath to the Constitution. These criminals have no redeeming qualities, They lie and cheat by passing laws benefiting those who bribe them."

You can read his complete article by clicking here. Another of his timely articles points out what Trump must do to defang the deep state. Click here.

------------------

You can help me continue my fight and stay informed by becoming a paid subscriber to my SubStack blog, Liberty or Death 101. Or join my Gorilla Joe Club to receive 14 free business books, hundreds of videos, and millions of articles you can resell without royalties.

Author bio: In case you haven't heard of me, I am a writer, publisher, documentary producer, libertarian, and a former prisoner of the War on Liberty. I am antiwar, anti-corporate, anti-fascist, anti-communist, anti-federalist, and an advocate for the absolute right to keep and bear arms. My background includes psychology, marketing, copywriting, and constitutional law. At one time I held power of attorney over the CIA's secret bank accounts containing over a trillion dollars in laundered drug money. I write books and articles on war, propaganda, the injustice system, government surveillance, fiction, self-help, and business. Check out my other books at https://book-showcase.com/

The Aftermath of Elections: A Reflection on Our Disappearing Constitutional Rights