The Supreme Court Criminals

It appears from the miniscule number of followers and subscribers on my YouTube and Rumble channels that most people prefer slavery over freedom. They choose to listen to endless chatter on trivial matters from Hannity and send $7 a month to Matt Taibbi for inconsequential posts on his Substack page. Yes, Matt Taibbi and Elon Musk exposed the Twitter censorship scam. So what? The Supreme Court just voted against free speech in Murthy vs. Missouri.

The case came before the Supreme Court after a lawsuit was filed to limit the government’s ability to pressure social media companies to restrict free speech. By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiffs did not have, quote, “legal standing”, close quote, to bring their lawsuit. Writing for the majority, turncoat Amy Cornhole Barrett concluded that social media companies can continue censoring content, even when pressured by the government to do so.

We are slaves, folks, that's the bottom line. Most of the ramblings from mainstream and social media pundits are nothing more than entertainment. They don’t care about you. All they want is a paycheck, an ego boost, and more views on YouTube. I prefer to stick with my hard-core analysis of what is important.

The political pundits keep yapping over and over about the Supreme Court’s rulings on abortion and presidential immunity. They never focus on the major issue facing us or they don’t care. The major issue is that every member of the Supreme Court, with the possible exception of Justice Clarence Thomas, are criminals. Their rulings over the years have left yellow piss stains on the Bill of Rights. Recently the Supreme Court struck down a few regulations, but those were on procedural grounds. They have also clawed back the unconstitutional practice of federal agencies who write their own laws. But the unconstitutional laws themselves have been upheld by the Supreme Court.

Nowhere is this more blatant than upholding federal firearm possession laws that are specifically prohibited under the Second Amendment. See video here or at https://www.bitchute.com/video/r97fASExDww

Of course, the Justices of the Supreme Court are not the only criminals. The district and appellate judges, federal prosecutors, federal agents, and all members of congress are also criminals under the conspiracy and RICO statutes.

I base this on one indisputable fact:

Anyone who violates your rights is a criminal under Title 18 U S C, Section 241, conspiracy against rights; and under section 242, Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Section 241 says, If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same. Or, If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured--They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section they shall be fined or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Remember the WACO and Ruby Ridge murders? I thought no one was above the law.

Section 242 says, Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien. Or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Or up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury. Color of law violations are unlawful actions by law enforcement or other government officials in the process of carrying out the law. This can include unlawful actions such as deprivation of medical care, deprivation of the right to vote, and discrimination.

What are our rights? They are numerous, but our FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS are expressed in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness— That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed. that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

It’s important to remember that the Bill of Rights, or more properly, the Bill of Wrongs, lists what the government cannot do. It does not assert or give us any rights because they preexisted the Constitution. And the rights that we have are virtually unlimited. As long as you are not using force or fraud against another person, whatever you do is not the government's business. That's what is meant by the Pursuit of Happiness.

Proof that we have more rights than those allegedly protected by the Bill of Rights is specified in Amendment 9: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

We must also keep in mind that the POWER of the federal government is not unlimited. The overlooked 10th amendment makes this clear. It says, The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Despite this limitation, 80 per cent of what the federal government does is not delegated or enumerated in the Constitution. It took a constitutional amendment to ban alcohol, so where is the delegated and enumerated power to criminalize drugs and other items? Where is the delegated and enumerated power to ban certain firearms? Where is the delegated and enumerated power to send our tax money to Israel or Ukraine? Giving money to foreign countries, or should I say sponsoring wars with our taxes, is not a delegated or enumerated power.

The Justices uphold these violations on absurd claims of "national security" and by a bastardized interpretation of the interstate commerce clause. Under their interpretation, they can ban or regulate anything at all, including personal behavior, even when it is not interstate or commercial.

The taxing power is, unfortunately, enumerated, but the misuse of taxes for purposes not authorized by the Constitution is not. Moreover, the federal income tax is unconstitutional as applied because the 1040 form and others violate the 1st and 5th amendment. You are forced to swear under oath to the veracity of your income statements. And you must report illegally acquired income as well. Though the Supreme Court says this compelled testimony doesn’t violate your 5th Amendment rights, common sense says otherwise. It also violates your right to free speech by forcing you to speak on the 1040 under threat of imprisonment. That is not free speech.

All federal firearm possession laws violate the Second Amendment because these laws are expressly prohibited from any infringement. The Second Amendment does not say you have the right to keep and bear only those firearms the government approves of. And it doesn’t say you must first get permission from the government to buy one.

The Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures and without probable cause has been watered down by so many rulings that it is meaningless. Under the Orwellian named Patriot Act and phony "War on Terror", the Supreme Court upholds warrantless searches, secret "sneak and peek" searches, eavesdropping on phone calls, and much more. And now we have the NSA’s unlawful collection of everyone’s phone calls, texts, and emails.

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is a joke. Lawyers must be members of a private clique known as the American Bar Association. They are considered "officers of the court" and beholden to court rules, not your defense. I know this from personal experience.

We don’t have a jury of our peers, either. It used to mean your neighbors who know you--not total strangers. Instead, they are selected from voter rolls in most cases, which means biased people who believe in the corrupt system and vote for it.

Grand juries offer no protection against the rigors of a trial because court rules allow prosecutors to use known perjury, false evidence, and bribed testimony to get an indictment. They can indict a ham sandwich.

Your right to real property is non-existent since you must pay rent (euphemistically called property taxes) every year or they seize it. Your right to property is also non-existent because it can be seized and held indefinitely on mere suspicion of criminal activity, or sold under the guise of Admiralty Law. Zoning restrictions also violate the Fifth Amendment's taking clause because they represent a partial taking without compensation.

Your right to due process is violated by red flag laws and other restrictions based solely on what you MIGHT do, rather than what you have done. And on and on.

These are not violations in the abstract. They have real world consequences that cause suffering and death to many people.

Keep in mind that Supreme Court Justices and judges are political appointees beholden to their masters. They are not God. Before they are permitted to take the bench, they are sent to Washington, DC for stern lectures by the FBI, CIA, and other department heads. They are told they must twist the Constitution into a pretzel whenever necessary to protect the government criminals. Your rights are in second or last place. And, notwithstanding Article Six of the US Constitution, no judge, prosecutor or federal agent is bound to enforce illegal laws. In fact, they become co-conspirators when they do. The Nazis at Nuremburg tried to rely on “just following orders”. It didn’t work out too well for them.

I believe that many people already realize the federal government is hopelessly corrupt and rotten to the core. Others consider it a criminal organization and no longer cooperate in any shape, form, or fashion. They rely on nullification of unconstitutional laws and refuse to convict anyone in federal courts.

If, like me, you are tired of being duped, suckered, swindled, snookered, hoodwinked, gaslighted, robbed, and lied to, join the club.

Otherwise, check this link to submit your proof that the Supreme Court Justices and their cohorts are NOT criminals. $10,000 cash is waiting for you.

💥Grab your FREE DOWNLOAD of a suppressed government document detailing their plan to disarm every American and surrender our Military Forces and Nuclear Weapons to the United Nations: https://www.humancattle.com/free-download

💥See ALL my fantastic books: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=KEN+PEALOCK+BOOKS&crid=35XBVJLZYYGXD&sprefix=ken+pealock+books%2Caps%2C121&ref=nb_sb_noss_1

Share

Copyright 2024 by Ken Pealock. All rights reserved.

I WILL PAY YOU $10,000 IF YOU CAN PROVE THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ARE NOT CRIMINALS.